In Florida, a proposed proposal to regulate the strength of medical marijuana failed to pass this year. The THC level in smokable cannabis would have been limited to 10% by volume under House Bill 1455. Sutter, John: Is setting legal maximums for THC content good policy, or just another case of “reefer madness”? According to him, the bill will have to be reintroduced in the next session, which ended on April 30. Rep. Spencer Roach (R-Fort Myers), the bill’s sponsor, admitted that “I think the bill is virtually dead.” The Florida House of Representatives decided in 2020 to impose THC limits on medical marijuana patients under 21. The cap, however, was removed from the final version, which was unanimously approved.
Proposals to limit THC levels, on the other hand, appear to be gaining traction across the country. Lauren Davis, a state representative from Washington, has presented legislation twice to limit the potency of concentrates supplied to anyone under 25. A Democratic-aligned group in Vermont is proposing potency caps in adult-use goods. Blue Rising Together, a Colorado-based group, is also advocating for caps. In addition to a flat sales tax, New York’s new legalization statute imposed taxation based on THC content.
The potency concern is reminiscent of the “reefer madness” of the 1930s, which linked the threat of marijuana to racist anxieties. Doctors in Florida who certify patients for medical marijuana licenses are among those fighting the potency restrictions. The majority of media coverage presented a schism in the scientific community over the hazards associated with cannabis use by teenagers and young adults, defined as those under 25. However, most media coverage portrays a schism between risks to young and those up to the age of 25 — meaning those under the age of 25. John Hudak: It appears as though an anti-legalization group is advocating for potency caps as a defensive measure.
He questions the idea that consumers of high-potency strains all achieve much higher levels than their parents. However, he argues, does increased potency imply an increased risk of harm? According to Hudak, there is a case to be made for high-potency strains being advantageous. He observes that studies establishing a relationship between psychosis and “skunk” strains may be mistaking correlation for causation. This is the underlying assumption of most of what is disguised as objective science, he explains.
Cannabis stigma is more frequently used to convict than to acquit, according to Peter Bergen. Bergen: Cannabis use has often been cited as a factor in the posthumous stigmatization of racially motivated police shootings victims. In her Texas jail cell, Sandra Bland was discovered hanging to death following a traffic check in July 2015, Bergen reports. And in February 2012, Trayvon Martin, 17, was assassinated by vigilante George Zimmerman on his way home from purchasing Skittles. The potency issue has far more significant political ramifications than either side may realize.
The THC percentage in a product does not always correspond to the strength with which one can be drunk after consuming it. According to Greg Gerdeman, Ph.D., a neurobiologist located in Nashville, potent hash and hash oil have been around for a long time, according to Greg Gerdeman, Ph.D., a neurobiologist situated in Nashville. “It is safe to use,” he explains. “If you’re concerned about overconsumption, the issue is how many milligrams of THC you’re consuming — not the percentage.” “It’s logical to believe that with a more concentrated substance, you can reach that greater level more quickly,” he admits. Gerdeman: Historically, physicians have been too cautious with their dosages.
According to him, delicacies can contain thousands of milligrams of THC extracted from hemp. According to Gerdeman, advertising should be truthful. “If you’re selling a substance that has the potential to get you extremely high, it should be labeled as such,” he argues. “I believe prohibition is not the answer,” he continues. “I believe it should be regulated,” he stated, “for medical reasons.”
“I believe it should not be taxed at all if it is for a real medical need,” Gerdeman said. Gerdeman refutes the premise that objective science has proven a causal relationship between potency and harmful effects. “Clearly, high-THC products should not be sold to children,” he says.