Detroit’s recreational cannabis licensing process remains on hold as a federal judge issued an injunction Thursday based on a lawsuit against the city.
According to city regulations, long-time residents and those with marijuana convictions or low incomes are the top priority in license review for starting a cannabis business. The filings opened on April 1, but a week later a legal challenge halted the process, leaving the adult marijuana business in Detroit pending.
Now, US District Judge Bernard Friedman writes in his ruling that the city’s program is “likely unconstitutional”.
A March 2 lawsuit filed by Resident Crystal Lowe argues that the rules for licensing justice, known as the Legacy Detroit Program, are unconstitutional and “unfairly favor” a certain group of residents, thereby preventing non-residents and those living in living in the city, being discriminated against, but not fitting into the checklist.
The city has denied these claims.
Friedman issued an injunction on the case on April 7, preventing the city from processing recreational cannabis licenses. Friedman then ordered an injunction on Thursday “because the city ordinance governing the process of obtaining a recreational marijuana retail license gives longtime Detroit residents an unfair, irrational, and likely unconstitutional advantage over any other petitioner “, he wrote.
As a rule, injunctions are quite short. The action Friedman took on Thursday shows the case is moving forward, the plaintiff is more likely to succeed in the trial and be irreparably harmed without pausing the city’s Legacy Detroit application process.
Friedman writes in Thursday’s order that the “facilitation of the regulation … embodies the very kind of economic protectionism that the Supreme Court has long outlawed”.
He adds that “the defendant has failed to demonstrate that his stated aim of helping those injured by the war on drugs is being pursued by reserving fifty percent or more of recreational marijuana licenses for those who have been at least for a long time.” living in Detroit for ten years. ” . “
The city, meanwhile, is offering changes to bring the regulation into line. But it refuses to give preference to its residents in any way.
“We will review the decision and develop a revised plan to address the judge’s concerns,” Kim James, chief attorney for the city’s management company, said in a statement to Crain. “In the meantime, one thing is certain: The City of Detroit will not issue adult marijuana licenses unless there is legal assurance that Detroiters will receive a fair share of those licenses.”
A request for comment from Lowe’s attorney was not immediately returned.
Lowe, planning to open a cannabis store in Detroit, originally sued the city of Detroit in the Wayne County Circuit Court, but the case was moved to the state’s Eastern District at the federal level.
In her lawsuit, Lowe argues that her past and place of residence make her a prime candidate for a regulatory framework that seeks equity. But even though Lowe lived in Detroit 11 for the past 30 years and had her experience with the drug – her mother was convicted of a marijuana crime in 2007 and she worked in the industry – she doesn’t qualify for the Legacy Detroit program. This means that she has little or no chance of getting a license, according to the lawsuit.
The city denies the allegations of injustice and unconstitutionality, its lawyers said in an April 6 response to the complaint.
The city’s Adult Ordinance gives preference in several ways: It allows for up to 75 retail licenses, at least half of which must go to Detroit Legacy applicants. You also get license review priority, pay less to get started, and get land discounts.
Lowe’s lawsuit argues that under the Detroit rules, legacy applicants will make up the vast majority of licenses as there is no limit to the number of the 75 licenses they can receive.
To qualify for the Legacy Detroiter Program, an applicant must have lived in the city for 15 of the last 30 years; have lived in the city for 13 of the past 30 years and are considered to be low-income residents; or lived in the city for 10 of the last 30 years and had a marijuana-related conviction or their parents received one before the applicant turned 18.
While Lowe’s mother was convicted of marijuana, it was when Lowe was 19 years old, according to court documents.
While legacy candidates and others could begin applying at the same time, the city had planned a tiered application review process that prioritized legacy applicants.
The city’s legal department claimed in its most recent response that it will begin accepting applications from all interested parties as of April 1. She argues that the old program is not discriminatory, but is “equal” in competition for long-term residents.
Detroit City Councilor James Tate spearheaded the creation of the Legacy Detroit Ordinance, which should establish the recreational marijuana industry and aim to bring more Detroit black and longtime residents into the community, for more than a year. The idea is to include those victims of the war on drugs after cannabis is legal and regulate the path to more diversity in the industry.